?

Log in

Middle Class Actor John Cygan (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0194201/) explains the consequences of AFTRA's Exhibit A contract (it covers TV shows & new media)

If you can watch only *ONE* video on SAG's impasse with the AMPTP, make it this one. And pass the link on to your friends who are either in the business or support it.


 
 
No it's not strictly union or H:LOTS related but it's very cool. Watch it and learn a lot!

 
 
18 December 2008 @ 08:47 am
...in the SAG Strike Authorization Vote
 
 
Current Location: on the interwebz
Current Mood: nice to see Alicia again
 
 
Elegant little video explaining residuals from EmpowerSagVoteYes
 
 
Current Location: on the interwebz
Current Mood: well informed
 
 
17 December 2008 @ 09:24 am
Dear Friends,

The New York Board of the Screen Actors Guild has released a statement of non-support for the upcoming strike authorization vote.
I am writing to tell you that I was not part of the meeting in which this resolution was adopted, I did not vote for it and I object to it.

Up to this point, I have kept quiet outside the boardroom. But since others think they have the right to speak for me, I must speak for myself.

I will support a “yes” vote for strike authorization. This is how I will vote and this is how I would recommend all membership to vote.

Is this the right time for a strike authorization? Yes. It is our only move. The contract is terrible. If you don’t believe me, go online and read about it yourself. [The AMPTP's contract itself is at: http://amptp.org/files/AMPTP_SAG_final_offer_063008.pdf] Visit SAG homepage [http://www.sag.org] for this info.

The complicating factors are the current economy and the unknown efficacy of a strike authorization. Each person must vote his or her best insight and conscience. I am voting mine.

Make no mistake, there is no better contract three years down the line. Sooner or later, you have to stand up and be counted. And sooner is always better than later.

Perhaps you don’t care about what you get paid or residuals or French hours or any of that. All you want is a job on any terms. OK, but if you like health care, pensions, a safe working environment please acknowledge the fact that all of these things were achieved through union collective bargaining. In the past, membership stood up for what we have now. The essence of being in a union is collective bargaining.

If you are voting “no” for strike authorization because you think that our current board of directors are strike mongerers or hot-heads, please think again because you are simply THINKING WHAT THE AMPTP WANTS YOU TO THINK. We are asking for a straightforward negotiation on straightforward points. We must negotiate these now, or suck lemons until we can. And when will that be? Three years from now? Please note that AMPTP never makes a better deal until they have to. Caving in now will only encourage them toward further union-busting tactics. For ALL the unions.

And with that in mind, be aware that our union is the largest with the most money to be distributed via residuals. We are the prize for the AMPTP. Likewise, as we cave, so will they continue to pressure our sister unions to wilt under pressure.

We have every right to negotiate our own contract. Yes, our leadership is stubborn and brassy. So what? Who do you want representing you? The producer’s friends?

After the last election the national board includes members who are very critical of our leadership. As a result, the board represents a balanced view regarding any potential strike. If you can trust anyone to make a balanced judgement, this is the time. But leadership must have strike authorization to get the AMPTP back to the table.

Two last thoughts.

Firstly, we are a union, we are a voting membership. The producers are a commercial entity. The people with whom we negotiate are hired guns. They can be replaced if they don’t do their job. And up to now they haven’t done a very good job finishing this contract and their bosses know it. There are major motion pictures waiting to start shooting. They cannot proceed until there is a contract (and no possibility whatsoever of a strike). AMPTP is threatening us with a punitive situation. But the sword cuts both ways. This is our strength.

Secondly, the Internet is going to be vastly profitable to the AMPTP on a scale never before seen. The costs of doing business will go way down. The middle-men in foreign markets will disappear (you don’t need a distributor when you do down-loads and streaming). And the “units” will be exactly accountable. The advertisers will know exactly how many viewers will watch the TV shows and movies downloaded or streamed. And if we do this right, so will we. Our contracts have established that we should receive a percentage of revenue as “residuals”, why are we giving that up now?

I am truly sorry that the New York Board has chosen to fight the leadership for most of this year. They have done nothing to make a difficult situation easier. I’m all for debate, but in the boardroom, not in public. We elected our officials, let’s let them do their job.

For more info go to: http://www.youtube.com/empowersagvoteyes

Sincerely
Eric Bogosian
 
 
Current Location: on the interwebz
Current Mood: go eric!!!
 
 
 
05 December 2008 @ 07:51 pm
Not strike related but interesting...

 
 
Current Location: on the interwebz
Current Mood: easily amused with no new CI
 
 
B.D. the diplomat speaks :)

 
 
Current Location: on the interwebz
Current Mood: Nice to see B.D. interviewed
 
 
01 December 2008 @ 04:59 pm
More temptation for CI fans



Eric Bogosian, Kathryn Erbe and Vincent D'Onofrio Signed Blind Spot (also signed by the writers Warren Leight & Charlie Rubin and the director Norberto Barba).

Bid at: http://criminalmindstvtidbits.blogspot.com/2008/12/law-order-criminal-intent-original.html
 
 
Current Location: on the interwebz
Current Mood: charitable
 
 
SAG is seizing the high ground where people with disabilities and their civil rights are concerned.

SAG is partnering with the other acting and performers guilds to promote the realistic portrayal of people with disabilities in the media and to help actors with disabilities win more parts. CI has been a pioneer in this area with the episode 'Silencer' casting so many performers with disabilities, but this idea of getting more parts for performers with disabilities is also an issue in the current SAG-AMPTP negotiations and one that the conglomerates are fighting SAG over...apparently the executives are reluctant to realize that people with disabilities have civil rights or that 56 million Americans have a disability of some kind.

I AM PWD Video Press Release http://www.sag.org/i-am-pwd-awareness-press-release

NYC I AM PWD Press Conference (Daryl Chill Mitchell who did a CI guest star in the Season 3 episode 'Mad Hops' spoke at this)http://www.sag.org/i-am-pwd-press-conference-nyc-100608

LA I AM PWD Press Conference (Linda Bove of Sesame Street, Geri Jewell of The Facts Of Life and Robert David Hall of C.S.I. spoke at this) http://www.sag.org/i-am-pwd-press-conference-la-100608

DC I AM PWD Press Conference (S Robert Morgan from The Wire spoke at this)http://www.sag.org/i-am-pwd-press-conference-dc-100608

If you want more info check out http://www.iampwd.org
 
 
Current Mood: inspired
 
 
Fresh from this Hollywood Reporter article entitled "Can TV take strike two?" comes this comment from the Wolf Man:

""Law & Order" creator Dick Wolf, in New York to receive the Founders Award at the International Emmys, said it's "unbelievable" that SAG could be moving toward a strike. "It's so out of touch with reality," he said. "Strikes very rarely accomplish what they set out to do, and it is a different situation than the '40s and '50s, when certain things had to be achieved.""

source: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3i0e025d77ecd54c6d8102d6c9dac86cdf

So I guess since the 50's there's been nothing new that actors or writers or directors or crew members have had to accomplish?!?!
 
 
Current Location: on the interwebz
Current Mood: questioning Wolf's reality